Tate Modern Again

I went to the Tate Modern yesterday, with someone very dear to me. I hadn’t met her for quite a few years so it was quite a reunion. We had a great time, I got to see Pollock again, and the Rothko room. There was Picabia but unfortunately you needed to pay to go in.

//www.math.dartmouth.edu/archive/c2w99/public_html/wklyimages/Nude.Desc.Stairc.II.Duchamp.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Nude Descending a Staircase II, Marcel DuChamp, 1912

I have written about him before so I don’t need to say any more, except it is a pity I couldn’t go in to see the works.

I must draw everyone’s attention to this though:

Jackson Pollock, Number 14, 1951

Jackson Pollock 1912-1956

Number 14 1951

Enamel on canvas
support: 1465 x 2695 mm frame: 1493 x 2721 x 63 mm
painting

Purchased with assistance from the American Fellows of the Tate Gallery Foundation 1988


By 1951, Pollock had achieved considerable success with his dripped and poured abstract painting, and was widely regarded as the leading young American artist. Perhaps fearing that he was reaching an impasse in his work, he embarked on a series of black and white paintings in which figures emerge, as they had in his early works. After rolling the canvas out on the floor, he would apply the paint – usually industrial enamel paint – with sticks and basting syringes, which he wielded ‘like a giant fountain pen’, according to his wife, Lee Krasner.

‘Awesome’ Rock on Jackson

1 Comment(s)

  1. The Tate Modern! My family spent many happy hours in that converted power plant. The National Portrait Gallery and V & A as well.

    As for Pollock, a Long Island artist to be sure. SUNY Stony Brook acquired his Hampton’s studio several years ago. The LI Carriage Museum at a recent exhibition highlighted other LI abstract artists from the 1940s and 50s. Exciting times for the art world.

    MadSilence


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a comment